Editorial Standards
Editorial Policy
Last updated: May 10, 2026
OndaVox is built as an aggregator and synthesis layer, not a content farm. The editorial standard is simple: attribute the source, preserve provenance, separate paid material from editorial judgment, and correct mistakes quickly.
This policy explains the operating rules behind source selection, AI-assisted drafting, publication, corrections, ads, affiliate content, and complaints.
Source selection
- Sources are approved through the source registry and may include publishers, public agencies, RSS/Atom feeds, public web pages, social/video sources, and manually curated sources.
- Source records can include language, vertical, quality rating, legal tier, feed type, license notes, display mode, and fetch interval.
- Sources can be disabled, reclassified, deprioritized, or removed if they become unreliable, unsafe, misleading, unlawful, or incompatible with OndaVox standards.
Attribution and provenance
Articles and syntheses should preserve source names, source links, publication metadata, evidence snippets, claim support, and original-source calls to action where available. OndaVox summaries are designed to send readers back to original reporting, not replace it.
AI-assisted workflow
- AI may help classify, summarize, translate, cluster, rewrite, draft, transcribe, generate images, and identify evidence trails.
- AI output should be reviewed for factual support, source alignment, misleading generalization, hallucinated details, and missing context before publication.
- Generated content should keep review metadata and source provenance such as RSS excerpt, generated from snippets, social transcript, manual article, human-written, or partner content.
- AI-generated images or media should keep provider, credit, prompt/license metadata, and alt text where available.
Human review
The publishing workflow is designed around review states, readiness checks, source trails, and publication snapshots. Human editors or authorized admins can approve, reject, schedule, update, roll back, or remove public content.
Corrections and updates
- Material factual errors should be corrected promptly after review.
- Significant changes should preserve editorial context through updated timestamps, correction notes, revision history, or archive snapshots where technically available.
- Readers, publishers, and rights holders can report errors through the contact page with the affected URL, disputed text, evidence, and requested correction.
Sponsored and affiliate content
Sponsored placements, affiliate links, product offers, or partner material must be labeled clearly. Advertising should not be disguised as independent editorial coverage. Commercial interest should not be allowed to erase attribution, source context, or safety review.
Sensitive and restricted content
OndaVox may limit or remove content involving dangerous instructions, harassment, hate, sexual exploitation, violent extremism, deceptive manipulation, medical misinformation, doxxing, private data exposure, malware, or other material that creates legal, safety, or platform risk.
Transparency for readers
- Public pages should make the publisher/operator, source registry, contact path, privacy policy, terms, and advertising disclosures easy to find.
- Articles should show dates, source context, byline or editorial label where available, source links, and transparency blocks where the underlying data supports them.
- Readers should be able to distinguish editorial material, AI-assisted summaries, sponsored material, affiliate links, and third-party source pages.
Complaints
Send editorial complaints, correction requests, source objections, and transparency questions to contact@2daycom.com. Include the URL, the issue, supporting evidence, and whether the request concerns accuracy, privacy, copyright, safety, or source attribution.